The Operating Maxim
'Probabilistic components propose. Deterministic components authorise.' Generative models and neural embeddings analyse; deterministic policy kernels govern execution.
A vendor-neutral target technology component architecture and closed-loop control system for modern autonomous security operations.
TIDIR governs the operational progression from raw environmental observation to automated mitigation within a strict closed loop:
The closed loop is completed as operational outcomes and incident graph nodes from Actuation (4) enter Continuous Calibration (5), which continuously re-keys threat caches, converts theoretical exposure into realized risk in CTEM platforms, and issues automated hardening pull requests back into the Telemetry Data Plane (1).
TIDIR addresses executive strategy, operational engineering, and formal system safety simultaneously. Select your primary lens to navigate straight to the specifications that matter to you (or explore the complete Role-Based Persona Journeys):
Focus on economics, the 4-phase brownfield migration roadmap, and business defensibility.
Examine the 4-plane control model, finding bus topology, concrete reference stacks, and invariants.
Dive into Polyglot Detection-as-Code, open lakehouse queries, and continuous CI/CD testing.
Interrogate the Agent Trust Boundary, ephemeral SPIFFE SVIDs, and monotonic containment.
Modern security operations struggle with three basic problems:
TIDIR addresses these problems by separating the architecture into four distinct planes—isolating untrusted data and advisory AI models within an open analytical environment, while protecting critical systems behind a lean, deterministic defence control plane.
TIDIR is built on seven core ideas. Each idea pairs an intuitive rule with a technical safety mechanism:
| Principle | Plain-English Intuition | Technical Mechanism & Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Confidence | Being confident an attack is happening does not grant permission to disrupt critical servers. | Confidence–Authority Separation: Epistemic scores confer zero execution privilege. All actions require independent policy approval. |
| Evidence Lineage | Every conclusion must show its work. | Evidence Provenance (INV-02): Hypotheses and alerts must link directly to immutable raw observation IDs (source_observation_ids). |
| Evidential Independence | Don't count the same observation twice just because multiple tools alerted on it. | Evidential Independence: Traces alert ancestry back to parent events so duplicate signals do not artificially inflate confidence. |
| Protected AI Boundary | AI models analyze and suggest; they never hold direct execution keys. | Agent Trust Boundary: Operates AI in read-only sandboxes with short-lived credentials ( |
| Monotonic Safety | If an automated response fails halfway through, never back out of security barriers. | Security-State Monotonicity: Invariant |
| Graceful Degradation | If advanced services go down, fallback to simpler methods rather than going blind. | Graceful Degradation: Automatically steps down through 4 operational tiers to edge spooling and rule-based timelines if streaming or AI fails. |
| Human Command | Independent human override. | Human Recoverability (INV-09): Independent out-of-band flight decks with cryptographically authenticated emergency stops and dual-authorisation bypass. |
To maintain engineering clarity, TIDIR explicitly distinguishes between established industry patterns and its own architectural contributions:
WHAT TIDIR DOES NOT CLAIM TO HAVE INVENTED
TIDIR does not claim to have invented data lakes, columnar storage, distributed message buses, graph analytics, probabilistic inference, cryptographic workload identities (SPIFFE), Detection-as-Code (DaC), circuit breakers, or the principle of least privilege.
TIDIR's contribution is the specific architectural synthesis and governing safety invariants under which these established techniques interact.
By wrapping untrusted telemetry and probabilistic AI agents within deterministic policy gates and monotonic state machines, TIDIR enables modern security operations to automate investigations and containment safely—while reducing the risk of runaway automation, self-granting authority, and loss of defensive visibility.
For detailed definitions of established, adapted, and TIDIR-specific concepts, explore the Architectural Glossary & Concept Taxonomy.
To serve executive leaders, enterprise architects, and engineering practitioners simultaneously, TIDIR organizes its specifications across three increasing levels of technical specificity:
TIDIR synthesizes defensive strategy, analytic taxonomy, API safety, and operational controls into a unified multi-framework alignment:
TIDIR is published as an open-source reference standard under the Apache 2.0 License:
/architecture.json/llms.txt/llms-full.txt/sitemap.xml